CO129-557-12 Armstrong and Turner v. Estate Duty Commissioner- appeal to Privy Council 18-5-1936 - 2-10-1936 — Page 3

3

seeni

appropriate that

nu co.

should make

the enquires in

question

The asce

tainment (the

law & practice involved is a mather

for the Solicitors,

as

one all ottiv

other

points involved in acgotiations

with the

London representatives

of the appellants.

Subject to fir G. Bushe's brous,

copy of Man and all evell.

to Burchell's, drawing attention

قا

that

the Governor's request in para 5-

ик

The UK practice in the matter

should be excertained

this brus / settlement

and that, if

necessay,

should be negotiated

with Kei

appellants representatives

Add

that it

seems

proper in

The

eiraumstances

that

the enguany of

the B.1. R. suggested should not be

undertaken by the Co.

Cyarstais

24/6-36

A

Keep a copy of enclosures 1 and 3,

send the rest and a copy of the despatch to

Burchells, draw their attention to the last

two